The Hero

November 2019Edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism (but are not) and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adamtt9 (talk) 19:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Help me!Edit
Please help me with...

MacaroniMaster5 (talk) 17:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I want to delete account!


 * This doesn't require administrator help as accounts cannot be deleted. Praxidicae (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019Edit
Hello, I'm Toddst1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:GB fan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on MINECON. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Google Stadia. Toddst1 (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * If you continue to add the deletion template, I will remove your access to this talk page. ~ GB fan 19:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MacaroniMaster5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • filter log • creation log) Request reason:

because I don't understand the block, on MINECON, all I did was add the upcoming one, besides 2020 has not been removed so why are you complaining if you're not gonna remove it. Also what was wrong with Google Stadia, I'm pretty almost everyone who had said it doesn't work!

Decline reason:

You seem to be treating Wikipedia as if it is social media or other forum to give your personal views on subjects or merely tell about them. This is an encyclopedia, not social media. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, not the personal views of editors. If you have encyclopedic contributions you want to make, please describe what those might be and assure the next reviewer that you are here to contribute to building this encyclopedia. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC) This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MacaroniMaster5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • filter log • creation log) Request reason:

reason: But with Google Stadia I'm pretty it was bad for everyone, and with MINECON, I still have no idea's what's wrong!

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Please review this link if you will be making further appeals.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

It was not cited, and mostly consisted of your personal views. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * What are you talking about? Search up "Google Stadia" on Youtube, you'll see it's not just broken for me, it's broken for everyone! And you still haven't explained what was wrong with my MINECON edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacaroniMaster5 (talk • contribs)
 * If you just want to ask a question, then do so but not as an unblock request; unblock requests are only for requesting unblock. If you don't understand what was problematic about your edits, you probably lack the maturity or skills needed to edit here. 331dot (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

So here's it again, but without the unblock request: What are you talking about? Search up "Google Stadia" on youtube and you'll see it's not just broken for me, it's broken for everyone. And you still haven't explained what's wrong with my MINECON edit.


 * Whether Google Stadia is or is not broken is immaterial. The edit was not cited to an independent reliable source and was essentially a personal statement by you. It was not encyclopedic content. I'm not going to explain what was wrong with each and every edit you made; you need to figure this out yourself. 331dot (talk) 21:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Okay, guess I'll never figure out. :)))))((((((((((((()()(


 * Then I suggest that you wait and spend some time maturing as a person and editor before requesting unblock again. 331dot (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MacaroniMaster5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • filter log • creation log) Request reason:

I think I've determined the problems of my edits, which is I didn't cite sources when I did the edits! MacaroniMaster5 (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nope. I suggest taking a break of at least six months, then applying under WP:SO. At that time, you'll need to clearly demonstrate you understand why your edits were disruptive and convince us you have matured sufficiently to be trusted to edit Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 20:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC) This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MacaroniMaster5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • filter log • creation log) Request reason:

My edits were right, so I wasn't edit warring! My edits were good, because they had so much information on them like on MINECON and whoever made it shorter is wrong, and Google Stadia edit was good, because it was telling people that it is broke, so yeah edits were good, and there was edit on Wii U, where I talked about Brico-Meiser, which is good because it's good, and yeah my edits are good, your edits are bad!

Decline reason:

Enough already. Talkpage access revoked for timewasting. Yunshui 雲水 08:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)